Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37450156›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Identification and Quantification of Affinity-Purified Proteins with MaxQuant, Followed by the Discrimination of Nonspecific Interactions with the CRAPome Interface.

Pey Yee Lee, Teck Yew Low

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pey Yee LeeUKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute (UMBI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Teck Yew LowUKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute (UMBI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. lowteckyew@ppukm.ukm.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is a powerful method to analyze protein-protein interactions (PPIs). The AP-MS approach provides an unbiased analysis of the entire protein complex and is useful to identify indirect interactors. However, reliable protein identification from the complex AP-MS experiments requires appropriate control of false identifications and rigorous statistical analysis. Another challenge that can arise from AP-MS analysis is to distinguish bona fide interacting proteins from the non-specifically bound endogenous proteins or the "background contaminants" that co-purified by the bait experiments. In this chapter, we will first describe the protocol for performing in-solution trypsinization for the samples from the AP experiment followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. We will then detail the MaxQuant workflow for protein identification and quantification for the PPI data derived from the AP-MS experiment. Finally, we describe the CRAPome interface to process the data by filtering against contaminant lists, score the interactions and visualize the protein interaction networks.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, AffinityChromatography, LiquidProteinsProteomicsProteinsAffinity purificationCRAPomeIn-solution digestionMass spectrometryMaxQuant

Identifiers

PMID37450156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.