ArticleCurrent medical science2023
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model on Adult Emergency Department Patients for Early Identification of Fulminant Myocarditis.
Article in Current medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on short-term prognosis in patients with acute myocarditis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for early mortality risk in patients with fulminant myocarditis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIt is difficult to predict fulminant myocarditis at an early stage in the emergency department. The objective of this study was to construct and validate a simple prediction model for the early identification of fulminant myocarditis.
methodsA total of 61 patients with fulminant myocarditis and 160 patients with acute myocarditis were enrolled in the training and internal validation cohorts. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression were selected to develop the prediction model. The selection of the model was based on overall performance and simplicity. A nomogram based on the optimal model was built, and its clinical usefulness was evaluated by decision curve analysis. The predictive model was further validated in an external validation group.
resultsThe resulting prediction model was based on 4 factors: systolic blood pressure, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and ventricular wall motion abnormality. The Brier scores of the final model were 0.078 in the training data set and 0.061 in the internal testing data set, respectively. The C-indexes of the training data set and the testing data set were 0.952 and 0.968, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram model developed based on the 4 predictors above had a positive net benefit for predicting probability thresholds. In the external validation cohort, the model also showed good performance (Brier score=0.007, and C-index=0.989).
conclusionWe developed and validated an early prediction model consisting of 4 clinical factors (systolic blood pressure, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and ventricular wall motion abnormality) to identify potential fulminant myocarditis patients in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.