Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37450006›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2023

Effect of bladder emptying status on the ureteral access sheath insertion resistance and following ureteral injury in RIRS: a prospective randomized controlled trial in academic hospital.

Leiyafang Mao, Zhifeng Li, Junjun Wen, Jiandong Xu, Zexian Zheng, Wen Zhong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leiyafang Mao *Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China.
Zhifeng Li *Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China.
Junjun Wen *Department of Urology, Dongxihu District People's Hospital, Wuhan, 431700, China.
Jiandong XuDepartment of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China.
Zexian ZhengDepartment of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China.
Wen ZhongDepartment of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, China. gzgyzhongwen@163.com.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNWuhan Dongxihu District People Hospital · CN

Funding

NSF of Guangdong 2021A1515011119NSF of Guangdong NSFC 82170777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of bladder emptying status on the ureteral access sheath (UAS) insertion resistance and following ureteral injury.

methodsEighty patients were enrolled and randomly divided into bladder emptying group and control group before UAS placement. A digital force gauge (Imada Z2-50N) was used to measure the resistance during the UAS insertion. The ureteral injury was evaluated and graded with Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) system at the end of procedure. The mean resistance, maximum resistance in different ureteral segments, and ureteral injury were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe mean resistance (3.12 ± 0.49 vs. 4.28 ± 0.52 N, P < 0.001), maximum resistance in the whole procedure (5.17 ± 0.72 vs. 6.39 ± 0.96 N, P < 0.001) and distal ureter (3.07 ± 0.75 vs. 6.18 ± 1.17 N, P < 0.001) in the bladder emptying group were significantly lower when compared to the control group. In subgroup analysis, the similar result was also noted in patients with BMI ≥ 25 when compared to patients with BMI < 25, while there was no significant difference between men and women, age ≥ 50 years versus age < 50 years. The incidence of PULS 1-2 ureteral injury in the bladder emptying group was lower than the control group (35% vs. 55%, P = 0.045). The ureteral injury in distal ureteral was less frequently noted in bladder emptying group than the control group (22.5% vs. 55%, P = 0.006); however, there was no significant difference in middle and upper ureter (P > 0.05).

conclusionEmptying the bladder before UAS insertion can effectively reduce the UAS insertion resistance and the risk of distal ureteral injury in RIRS.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUreterUrologic DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUreteroscopyUrinary BladderResistanceRetrograde intrarenal surgeryRIRSUreteral access sheathUreteral injury

Identifiers

PMID37450006
OpenAlexW4384340294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.