Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37449956›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Phase 4 clinical trials in the era of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and their importance to optimize the COVID-19 vaccination.

Ana Eliza Garcia Ralise, Tais Mendes Camargo, Fernando Augusto Lima Marson

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Viral vector-based therapeutic HPV vaccines.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Eliza Garcia RaliseLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3344-6589
Tais Mendes CamargoLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-280X
Fernando Augusto Lima MarsonLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4955-4234
Universidade São Francisco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the appearance of SARS-CoV-2, the scientific community has worked relentlessly to gather enough information about the illness caused by this virus infection. Such great effort has resulted in increased scientific publication, including phase 4 clinical trials addressing the applicability of COVID-19 vaccines. In those trials that investigated the properties of the vaccine among participants with morbidities, mainly immunocompromised individuals, the safety was recommended, but in the presence of immunogenicity, such protection was considered of short and medium terms. It was also observed that a physically active lifestyle might increase the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases and in immunocompromised patients. The coadministration of different types of vaccine such as the combination of the recombinant adenovirus type 5 (AD5)-vectored Convidecia as heterologous reinforcement vs. CoronaVac with homologous reinforcement in adults previously vaccinated with CoronaVac, as well as the coadministration of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine followed by the administration of the tetravalent influenza vaccine (Fragmented, Inactivated) and the pneumococcal vaccine 23 presented satisfactory immunogenicity. However, the heterologous reinforcement had better immunogenicity when compared to the homologous reinforcement. Simultaneous COVID-19 vaccination and vaccines against seasonal influenza did not raise safety issues, producing acceptable levels of adverse reactions and preserving the antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2. In the lot-to-lot consistency evaluation, CoronaVac was seen to induce an immune response considered relatively high, and the lots presented a similar profile of stability and immunogenicity, thus enabling their large-scale distribution. In brief, this article addressed, mainly, the importance of evaluating the immunological response in the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with specific health conditions (e.g., immunocompromised individuals) aiming at enabling adjustments to the vaccine calendar in national vaccination programs.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCOVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdultAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccinePandemicsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivatedclinical trialCOVID-19phase 4 clinical trialSARS-CoV-2sciencevaccination

Identifiers

PMID37449956
PMCPMC10351445
OpenAlexW4384298102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.