ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023
Challenges in development of vaccines directed toward antimicrobial resistant bacterial species.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunotherapeutic modalities for combating multidrug-resistant bacteria: therapeutic promises of antibodies and next-generation vaccines.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- Revolutionizing Nanovaccines: A New Era of Immunization.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Vaccines as Potential Frontliners Against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): A Focused Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- The intricacies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Phenotypic and genotypic profiling of swine-derived Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Biochemistry and Future Perspectives of Antibiotic Resistance: An Eye on Active Natural Products.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- An Overview of the Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Resistance.Microorganisms · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered by WHO one of the top ten public health threats. New control strategies involving concerted actions of both public and private sectors need to be developed. Vaccines play a major role in controlling the spread of AMR pathogens by decreasing transmission and limiting the use of antibiotics, reducing at the end the selective pressure for the emergence of new resistant strains. In this review, by using as example some of the most serious AMR pathogens, we highlighted the major hurdles from a research and development point of view. New approaches to better understand the immunological mechanisms of response to both natural infections and vaccines that aimed to identify correlates of protection, together with the application of new technologies for vaccine design and delivery are discussed as potential solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.