Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Splanchnic Nerve Modulation Effects on Surrogate Measures of Venous Capacitance.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal, device-based therapeutic targeting of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Heart Failure: a Punch from the Gut.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Splanchnic nerve modulation (SNM) is an emerging procedure to reduce cardiac filling pressures in heart failure. Although the main contributor to reduction in cardiac preload is thought to be increased venous capacitance in the splanchnic circulation, supporting evidence is limited. We examined changes in venous capacitance surrogates pre- and post-SNM. Methods and Results This is a prespecified analysis of a prospective, open-label, single-arm interventional study evaluating the effects of percutaneous SNM with ropivacaine in chronic heart failure with elevated filling pressures at rest and with exercise. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic assessment pre- and post-SNM. Blood pressure changes with modified Valsalva maneuver and hemoconcentration, pre- and post-SNM were compared using a repeated measures model. Inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility (>50% decrease in size with inspiration), and presence of bendopnea pre- and post-SNM were also compared. Fifteen patients undergoing SNM (age 58 years, 47% women, 93% with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) were included. After SNM, changes in systolic blood pressure during Valsalva (peak-to-trough) were greater (41 versus 48 mm Hg,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.