Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37449537›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Creating patient-specific digital phantoms with a longitudinal atlas for evaluating deformable CT-CBCT registration in adaptive lung radiotherapy.

Sebastian Meyer, Sadegh Alam, Li Cheng Kuo, Yu-Chi Hu, Yilin Liu, Wei Lu, Ellen Yorke, Anyi Li, Laura Cerviño, Pengpeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastian MeyerDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sadegh AlamDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Li Cheng KuoDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yu-Chi HuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yilin LiuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Wei LuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ellen YorkeDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Anyi LiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Laura CerviñoDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Pengpeng ZhangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality assurance of deformable image registration (DIR) is challenging because the ground truth is often unavailable. In addition, current approaches that rely on artificial transformations do not adequately resemble clinical scenarios encountered in adaptive radiotherapy. PURPOSE: We developed an atlas-based method to create a variety of patient-specific serial digital phantoms with CBCT-like image quality to assess the DIR performance for longitudinal CBCT imaging data in adaptive lung radiotherapy.

methodsA library of deformations was created by extracting the longitudinal changes observed between a planning CT and weekly CBCT from an atlas of lung radiotherapy patients. The planning CT of an inquiry patient was first deformed by mapping the deformation pattern from a matched atlas patient, and subsequently appended with CBCT artifacts to imitate a weekly CBCT. Finally, a group of digital phantoms around an inquiry patient was produced to simulate a series of possible evolutions of tumor and adjacent normal structures. We validated the generated deformation vector fields (DVFs) to ensure numerically and physiologically realistic transformations. The proposed framework was applied to evaluate the performance of the DIR algorithm implemented in the commercial Eclipse treatment planning system in a retrospective study of eight inquiry patients.

resultsThe generated DVFs were inverse consistent within less than 3 mm and did not exhibit unrealistic folding. The deformation patterns adequately mimicked the observed longitudinal anatomical changes of the matched atlas patients. Worse Eclipse DVF accuracy was observed in regions of low image contrast or artifacts. The structure volumes exhibiting a DVF error magnitude of equal or more than 2 mm ranged from 24.5% (spinal cord) to 69.2% (heart) and the maximum DVF error exceeded 5 mm for all structures except the spinal cord. Contour-based evaluations showed a high degree of alignment with dice similarity coefficients above 0.8 in all cases, which underestimated the overall DVF accuracy within the structures.

conclusionsIt is feasible to create and augment digital phantoms based on a particular patient of interest using multiple series of deformation patterns from matched patients in an atlas. This can provide a semi-automated procedure to complement the quality assurance of CT-CBCT DIR and facilitate the clinical implementation of image-guided and adaptive radiotherapy that involve longitudinal CBCT imaging studies.

Indexed as

Spiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studiesadaptive radiotherapydeformable image registrationlongitudinal atlas

Identifiers

PMID37449537
PMCPMC10787815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.