Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37449339›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Combination of deep learning and ensemble machine learning using intraoperative video images strongly predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Wataru Nakamura, Makoto Sumitomo, Kenji Zennami, Masashi Takenaka, Manabu Ichino, Kiyoshi Takahara, Atsushi Teramoto, Ryoichi Shiroki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Applications of artificial intelligence in urologic oncology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wataru NakamuraDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Makoto SumitomoDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2589-922X
Kenji ZennamiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Masashi TakenakaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Manabu IchinoDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kiyoshi TakaharaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Atsushi TeramotoFaculty of Radiological Technology, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Ryoichi ShirokiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe recently reported the importance of deep learning (DL) of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the degree of urinary incontinence (UI) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, our results were limited because the prediction accuracy was approximately 70%.

aimTo develop a more precise prediction model that can inform patients about UI recovery post-RARP surgery using a DL model based on intraoperative video images. METHODS AND

resultsThe study cohort comprised of 101 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP. Three snapshots from intraoperative video recordings showing the pelvic cavity (prior to bladder neck incision, immediately following prostate removal, and after vesicourethral anastomosis) were evaluated, including pre- and intraoperative parameters. We evaluated the DL model plus simple or ensemble machine learning (ML), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed through sensitivity and specificity. Of 101, 64 and 37 patients demonstrated "early continence (using 0 or 1 safety pad at 3 months post-RARP)" and "late continence (others)," respectively, at 3 months postoperatively. The combination of DL and simple ML using intraoperative video snapshots with clinicopathological parameters had a notably high performance (AUC, 0.683-0.749) to predict early recovery from UI after surgery. Furthermore, combining DL with ensemble artificial neural network using intraoperative video snapshots had the highest performance (AUC, 0.882; sensitivity, 92.2%; specificity, 78.4%; overall accuracy, 85.3%) to predict early recovery from post-RARP incontinence, with similar results by internal validation. The addition of clinicopathological parameters showed no additive effects for each analysis using DL, EL and simple ML.

conclusionOur findings suggest that the DL algorithm with intraoperative video imaging is a reliable method for informing patients about the severity of their recovery from UI after RARP, although it is not clear if our methods are reproducible for predicting long-term UI and pad-free continence.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRoboticsUrinary IncontinenceHumansMachine LearningMaleProstateProstatectomydeep learningensemble machine learningrobot-assisted radical prostatectomyurinary continencevideo images

Identifiers

PMID37449339
PMCPMC10480482
OpenAlexW4384300638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.