ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
A novel DNA damage repair-related gene signature predicting survival, immune infiltration and drug sensitivity in cervical cancer based on single cell sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis Constructs an Intratumoral Heterogeneity-Corrected Prognostic Signature for Cervical Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Serum USP1 and PD-L1 levels independently predict treatment response and prognosis in cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Mapping cellular interactions and communication landscapes in cervical cancer via single-cell transcriptomics.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- The DDR-immune fitness score: a biomarker for guiding parp and immunotherapy synergy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model for cervical cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy: a study based on TCGA database.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aberrant DNA damage repair (DDR) is one of the hallmarks of tumors, and therapeutic approaches targeting this feature are gaining increasing attention. This study aims to develop a signature of DDR-related genes to evaluate the prognosis of cervical cancer (CC). Methods: Differentially expressed genes were identified between high and low DDR groups of cells from the single-cell RNA sequencing dataset GSE168652 based on DDR scores. Using the ssGSEA and WGCNA methods, DDR-related differentially expressed genes were identified from different patients within the TCGA-CESC cohort. Using Cox analysis and LASSO regression analysis, a DDR-related gene signature was constructed based on the intersection of two groups of differentially expressed genes and DDR-related genes from WGCNA, and validated in GSE52903. Immune cell infiltration analysis, mutation analysis, survival analysis, drug sensitivity analysis, etc., were performed in different groups which were established based on the DDR gene signature scoring. A key gene affecting prognosis was selected and validated through biological experiments such as wound healing, migration, invasion, and comet assays. Results: A novel DDR-related signature was constructed and the nomogram results showed this signature performed better in predicting prognosis than other clinical features for CC. The high DDR group exhibited poorer prognosis, weaker immune cell infiltration in the immune microenvironment, lower expression of immune checkpoint-related genes, lower gene mutation frequencies and more sensitivity to drugs such as BI.2536, Bleomycin and etc. Conclusion: The 7 DDR-related gene signature was an independent and powerful prognostic biomarker that might effectively evaluate the prognosis of CC and provide supplementary information for a more personalized evaluation and precision therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.