Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37449192›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

A systematic literature review for APT detection and Effective Cyber Situational Awareness (ECSA) conceptual model.

Duraid Thamer Salim, Manmeet Mahinderjit Singh, Pantea Keikhosrokiani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duraid Thamer SalimSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Manmeet Mahinderjit SinghSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Pantea KeikhosrokianiSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in computing technology and the growing number of devices (e.g., computers, mobile) connected to networks have contributed to an increase in the amount of data transmitted between devices. These data are exposed to various types of cyberattacks, one of which is advanced persistent threats (APTs). APTs are stealthy and focus on sophisticated, specific targets. One reason for the detection failure of APTs is the nature of the attack pattern, which changes rapidly based on advancements in hacking. The need for future researchers to understand the gap in the literature regarding APT detection and to explore improved detection techniques has become crucial. Thus, this systematic literature review (SLR) examines the different approaches used to detect APT attacks directed at the network system in terms of approach and assessment metrics. The SLR includes papers on computer, mobile, and internet of things (IoT) technologies. We performed an SLR by searching six leading scientific databases to identify 75 studies that were published from 2012 to 2022. The findings from the SLR are discussed in terms of the literature's research gaps, and the study provides essential recommendations for designing a model for early APT detection. We propose a conceptual model known as the Effective Cyber Situational Awareness Model to Detect and Predict Mobile APTs (ECSA-tDP-MAPT), designed to effectively detect and predict APT attacks on mobile network traffic.

Indexed as

APT malwareAttack behaviourIntrusion detection systemMachine learningNetwork trafficSituation awareness model

Identifiers

PMID37449192
PMCPMC10336420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.