Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37449111›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of face-to-face marketing learning via TikTok, YouTube and video conferencing.

Eloy Gil-Cordero, Carlos Rodriguez-Rad, Pablo Ledesma-Chaves, María-Elena Sánchez Del Río-Vázquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eloy Gil-CorderoDepartment of Business Administration and Marketing, University of Seville, Seville, 41018, Spain.
Carlos Rodriguez-RadDepartment of Business Administration and Marketing, University of Seville, Seville, 41018, Spain.
Pablo Ledesma-ChavesDepartment of Business Administration and Marketing, University of Seville, Seville, 41018, Spain.
María-Elena Sánchez Del Río-VázquezDepartment of Business Administration and Marketing, University of Seville, Seville, 41018, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of virtual platforms, social networks and online applications has been totally modified by returning to face-to-face systems. The mandatory use of these tools in the period of social distancing has led to their extensive development. This paper analyzes the effects of the use of ICTs in a purely face-to-face environment. Therefore, it analyzes the factors that affect student satisfaction and effectiveness in marketing learning through the use of digital tools and online applications in face-to-face classes, and this analysis is from a dual perspective of user and learning dissatisfaction. Using a learner-centered approach in university classes, the use of the digital platform Blackboard, the digital tool YouTube and the social network TikTok in university marketing teaching is analyzed. The study is carried out on a sample of 327 university students of different levels. The analysis is performed through a mixed methodology using a symmetric (PLS-SEM) and non-symmetric (fsQCA) approach, allowing a better generalization of the results. In the measurement of effectiveness, both user assessment and student learning assessment are significative, the two being affected in a similar way. However, they are not related to each other, acting independently. Attitude is the construct that has the greatest impact on both types of satisfaction. Perceived enjoyment also exerts a notable influence, especially on learning satisfaction. The study presents one of the first post-pandemic approaches to the analysis of the effectiveness of technological tools (ICT tools) in the face-to-face setting of university marketing classes.

Indexed as

fsQCALearning effectivenessMarketing learningPLS-SEMSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37449111
PMCPMC10336423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.