Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37449109›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Quorum sensing interference by phenolic compounds - A matter of bacterial misunderstanding.

Emília Maria França Lima, Stephen C Winans, Uelinton Manoel Pinto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of Bluestem (International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Rambutan (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emília Maria França LimaDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Food Research Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stephen C WinansDepartment of Microbiology, 361A Wing Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Uelinton Manoel PintoDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Food Research Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, numerous publications have emerged in the literature focusing on the inhibition of quorum sensing (QS) by plant extracts and phenolic compounds. However, there is still a scarcity of studies that delve into the specific mechanisms by which these compounds inhibit QS. Thus, our question is whether phenolic compounds can inhibit QS in a specific or indirect manner and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms involved. This study is focused on the most studied QS system, namely, autoinducer type 1 (AI-1), represented by

Indexed as

Acyl homoserine lactonesCell-cell communicationFlavonoidsMechanismQuorum quenching

Identifiers

PMID37449109
PMCPMC10336516
OpenAlexW4382134471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.