ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023
Evaluation of the acromion variants in MRI and their association with rotator cuff injuries in non-traumatic patients.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based prediction of rotator cuff tears using anatomical parameters: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- The Novel Acromial Angle is associated with the severity of full-thickness rotator cuff tear: a retrospective radiographic study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Shoulder Pain Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Emerging Trends.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- A radiological study on the relationship between the novel acromial angle and rotator cuff tears.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Understanding demographic and MRI parameters with determinant role in rotator cuff tearing (RCT) is required to predict outcomes and select more appropriate treatment in patients with non-traumatic shoulder pain. This study aimed to survey the association of rotator cuff tears with these factors. Methods: We performed this cross-sectional study on patients referred to Kashani Hospital with non-traumatic shoulder pain suspected of rotator cuff injuries from April 2020 to February 2021. We obtained their demographic data and MRI from electronic hospital records. After that, two radiologists reviewed MRI and recorded data. We employed the SPSS 23 software to organize the obtained results and statistical evaluations. Results: 371 subjects, with the age of 48.61 ± 14.89 years, were included in our study, and 50% of them were male. The flat and down-sloping acromion and partial tearing of the supra and infraspinatus tendons were more frequent than the others. Gender could not consider as a determinant factor for the severity of tendon injuries, acromion types and variants. The relation of age to acromion morphology and the tendinopathy severity was significant. Remarkably, down-sloping acromion was higher at all the acromion shapes; however, it makes no difference in the level of supra and infraspinatus involvement. Moreover, we found that partial tearing was higher in all acromion types, except concave. This distribution was significant only for supraspinatus tears. Conclusion: The clinical decision is the most important step in patients with RCT and MRI prognostic factors, which are helpful to improve the management of the cases. RCT in older patients and down-slope acromion was more severe than the others. According to the previous studies, acromion morphology (as an important determinant factor) in RCT could be influenced by age, as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.