Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448999›Full record

ArticleGhana medical journal2022

Application of the hub and spokes model in improving access to cervical cancer screening in Ghana.

Kofi Effah, Evans K Attivor, Bernard H Atuguba, Donatus D Adaletey, Delali A Ofori, Philip Diame, Ethel Tekpor, Comfort M Wormenor, Isaac Gedzah, Dominic Agyiri and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ghana medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cervical cancer prevention in Ghana.Ghana medical journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kofi EffahCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Evans K AttivorNorth Tongu District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Adidome, Ghana.
Bernard H AtugubaCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Donatus D AdaleteyCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Delali A OforiNorth Tongu District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Adidome, Ghana.
Philip DiameCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Ethel TekporCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Comfort M WormenorCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Isaac GedzahCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Dominic AgyiriCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Joseph E AmuahCatholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana.
Patrick K AkakpoDepartment of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Jonathan M GmanyamiFred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Martin AdjuikFred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Hubert AmuFred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Margaret KwekuFred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the contribution of lower-level health facilities in increasing access to cervical cancer screening in the North Tongu District. Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. The Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre (CCPTC) of the Catholic Hospital, Battor, served as the hub, and six health facilities (3 health centres and 3 CHPS compounds) served as the spokes. From April 2018 to September 2019, the well-resourced CCPTC trained 6 nurses at selected Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) / Health Centres (HCs) (spokes) to provide cervical cancer screening services. The nurses, after training, started screening with VIA and HPV DNA testing. Participants: A total of 3,451women were screened by the trained nurses. This comprised 1,935 (56.1%) from the hub and 1,516 (43.9%) from the spokes. Main outcome measure: The detection of screen positives. Results: The screen positives were 19.4% (375/1935) at the hub and 4.9% (74/1516) at the spokes. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that a hub and spokes model for cervical cancer screening is possible in limited resource settings. Designating and resourcing a 'hub' that supports a network of 'spokes' could increase women's access to cervical cancer screening. This approach could create awareness about cervical cancer screening services and how they can be accessed. Funding: None declared.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGhanaHumansMass ScreeningCervical CancerGhanahub and spokes modellow resource settingsNorth Tongu Districtpreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID37448999
PMCPMC10336637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.