ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Designing and determining the effectiveness of a suicide intervention package for psychologists working in the primary health care system.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Suicide is a major public health problem around the world. The present study aimed to design and determine the effectiveness of a suicide intervention package for psychologists working in the primary health care system in Hormozgan Province. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in two phases: qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, it was a thematic analysis type, and in the quantitative phase, it was quasi-experimental type with pretest-posttest in two groups of intervention and comparison. To standardize the suicide intervention package, Delphi method was used, and for quantitative content validity, content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were used. In the quantitative phase of the study, the statistical population of the study included 270 people who had suicidal ideations and had no history of suicide attempt. Among them, 135 people were included in the intervention group and 135 people were included in the comparison group using a convenience sampling method. They were selected among those referred to eight comprehensive rural and urban health service centers in eight cities of Hormozgan Province. The results were analyzed by MANCOVA statistical test. Results: CVR was more than 0.75 and CVI was more than 0.87. In the quantitative phase, the results showed a significant difference between the means before and after the intervention for the variables of psychological distress, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness ( Conclusion: It seems that psychological suicide preventive interventions in the primary health care system are effective in reducing psychological distress,suicidal thoughts and hopelessness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.