Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Phenomics based prediction of plant biomass and leaf area in wheat using machine learning approaches.

Biswabiplab Singh, Sudhir Kumar, Allimuthu Elangovan, Devendra Vasht, Sunny Arya, Nguyen Trung Duc, Pooja Swami, Godawari Shivaji Pawar, Dhandapani Raju, Hari Krishna and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Biswabiplab SinghDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sudhir KumarDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Allimuthu ElangovanDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Devendra VashtDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sunny AryaDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Nguyen Trung DucDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Pooja SwamiDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Godawari Shivaji PawarDivision of Agricultural Botany, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, India.
Dhandapani RajuDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Hari KrishnaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Lekshmy SatheeDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Monika DalalICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Rabi Narayan SahooDivision of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Viswanathan ChinnusamyDivision of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INMarathwada Agricultural University · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Phenomics has emerged as important tool to bridge the genotype-phenotype gap. To dissect complex traits such as highly dynamic plant growth, and quantification of its component traits over a different growth phase of plant will immensely help dissect genetic basis of biomass production. Based on RGB images, models have been developed to predict biomass recently. However, it is very challenging to find a model performing stable across experiments. In this study, we recorded RGB and NIR images of wheat germplasm and Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) of Raj3765xHD2329, and examined the use of multimodal images from RGB, NIR sensors and machine learning models to predict biomass and leaf area non-invasively. Results: The image-based traits (i-Traits) containing geometric features, RGB based indices, RGB colour classes and NIR features were categorized into architectural traits and physiological traits. Total 77 i-Traits were selected for prediction of biomass and leaf area consisting of 35 architectural and 42 physiological traits. We have shown that different biomass related traits such as fresh weight, dry weight and shoot area can be predicted accurately from RGB and NIR images using 16 machine learning models. We applied the models on two consecutive years of experiments and found that measurement accuracies were similar suggesting the generalized nature of models. Results showed that all biomass-related traits could be estimated with about 90% accuracy but the performance of model BLASSO was relatively stable and high in all the traits and experiments. The R Discussion: Based on the quantification power analysis of i-Traits, the determinants of biomass accumulation were found which contains both architectural and physiological traits. The best predictor i-Trait for fresh weight and dry weight prediction was Area_SV and for shoot area prediction was projected shoot area. These results will be helpful for identification and genetic basis dissection of major determinants of biomass accumulation and also non-invasive high throughput estimation of plant growth during different phenological stages can identify hitherto uncovered genes for biomass production and its deployment in crop improvement for breaking the yield plateau.

Indexed as

high-throughput phenotyping (HTP)i-traitsmachine learningNIR imageRGB imageshoot areawheat

Identifiers

PMID37448870
PMCPMC10337996
OpenAlexW4382399184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.