Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448857›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of biomedical science2023

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR).

Ka Wah Kelly Tang, Beverley C Millar, John E Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of biomedical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 482 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
482citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
147.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

482 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 806 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

422 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ka Wah Kelly TangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Beverley C MillarSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
John E MooreSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
University of Ulster · GBBelfast City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has now emerged as a chronic public health problem globally, with the forecast of 10 million deaths per year globally by 2050. AMR occurs when viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites do not respond to antimicrobial treatments in humans and animals, thus allowing the survival of the microorganism within the host. The prominent cause contributing to the current crisis remains to be the overuse and misuse of antimicrobials, particularly the inappropriate usage of antibiotics, increasing the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. The global consumption and usage of antibiotics are therefore closely monitored at all times. This review provides a current overview of the implications of strategies used by international governmental organisations, including the UN's 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to address the problem of antibiotic resistance, as well as the "

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAnimalsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAMRantibiotic resistanceantimicrobial resistanceinfectionone health

Identifiers

PMID37448857
PMCPMC10336207
OpenAlexW4382585357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.