Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448820›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy and ultrastructure

Histological Changes in the Background Renal Parenchyma in Neoplastic Nephrectomies and Nephroureterectomy: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience.

Reem A Al Zahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy and ultrastructure. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Reem A Al ZahraniDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies specimen with neoplastic diagnosis provide a great opportunity to examine the background kidney parenchyma. This will help in exploring any microscopic abnormality that may affect the functional capacity of the residual renal tissue and assess the possible need for nephrologist intervention in maximizing the function of the residual renal parenchyma. Aim: Evaluation of this part of the kidney is overlooked in different centers around the world. Method: A total of 124 specimens of nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies performed at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 were reviewed. The microscopic findings in the nonneoplatic parenchyma were documented. Furthermore, the extent to which these findings were initially identified, investigated, and reported was measured. Results: Hypertensive and diabetic nephropathy were among the most common findings in the diseased kidney. The nonneoplastic kidney was well sampled in 95% of the cases and mentioned in the report in 25% of the cases. Conclusion: Although, the evaluation of this part of the kidney is essential, and of great help for the patient prognosis, and quality of kidney function, it is overlooked in different centers around the world, and the causes behind this requires further exploration.

Indexed as

Diabetic nephropathyincidental kidney disordersnephrectomy reportingnephrectomy samplingnonneoplastic kidney

Identifiers

PMID37448820
PMCPMC10337669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.