Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448754›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2023

Evaluation of primary caesarean section and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary care hospital and impact on current obstetric practice.

Amey Chugh, Swati Lal, Tanvi Nijhawan, Pooja Biradar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amey ChughDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Swati LalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Tanvi NijhawanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Pooja BiradarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the rising rates of primary caesarean section, its indications and neonatal outcomes. Study design: This was a prospective observational study of 1000 deliveries after 28 weeks gestation. The 312 primary caesarean section (CS) cases were studied with respect to their antepartum and postpartum outcomes. Results: The primary caesarean section (PCS) rate was 31.2% which had risen from 17% in 2018-2019 at the institute of study. The most common indication of PCS was found to be foetal distress (34.2%). Out of all PCS 25.64% were preterm deliveries. 57.05% of PCS born babies required NICU admission after birth and 59.93% had 1 min APGAR score < 7. The most common indication for NICU admission was respiratory distress (55.13%). Conclusion: The rising trend of CS can be attributed to rising PCS rate. Also the indications should be medically justified whenever a CS is attempted as it has significant adverse maternal as well as neonatal implications and also affects the subsequent pregnancy outcomes. CS delivered babies are more prone for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and NICU admissions.

Indexed as

Caesarean sectionFoetal distressIndicationsNICU admissionRespiratory distress

Identifiers

PMID37448754
PMCPMC10338144
OpenAlexW4383106794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.