Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Free word association analysis of German laypeople's perception of biodiversity and its loss.

Annike Eylering, Kerstin Neufeld, Felix Kottmann, Sebastian Holt, Florian Fiebelkorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annike EyleringBiology Didactics, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Kerstin NeufeldBiology Didactics, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Felix KottmannBiology Didactics, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Sebastian HoltBiology Didactics, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Florian FiebelkornBiology Didactics, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Osnabrück University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the dramatic biodiversity crisis, it is crucial to understand how people perceive biodiversity. Knowledge of how thoughts are organized around this concept can identify which ideas are best to focus on biodiversity conservation information campaigns. The primary aim of the present study was to identify social representations of the German public regarding the concept of biodiversity and its loss using a free word association test. Furthermore, unique association networks were analyzed. For this purpose, data collection was performed in September 2021 in Germany using an online questionnaire to assess participants' associations with the prompt "biodiversity" (

Indexed as

biodiversity crisisclimate changefree word association testIUCN red list of threatened speciesnetwork analysissocial representation theoryspecies loss

Identifiers

PMID37448712
PMCPMC10338174
OpenAlexW4382585012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.