ArticleF1000Research2021
Organizing training workshops on gene literature retrieval, profiling, and visualization for early career researchers.
Article in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the potential relevance of CEACAM6 as a blood transcriptional biomarker.F1000Research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-career researchers must acquire the skills necessary to effectively search and extract information from biomedical literature. This ability is for instance crucial for evaluating the novelty of experimental results, and assessing potential publishing opportunities. Given the rapidly growing volume of publications in the field of biomedical research, new systematic approaches need to be devised and adopted for the retrieval and curation of literature relevant to a specific theme. In this context, we present a hands-on training curriculum aimed at retrieval, profiling, and visualization of literature associated with a given topic. The curriculum was implemented in a workshop in January 2021. Here we provide supporting material and step-by-step implementation guidelines with the ISG15 gene literature serving as an illustrative use case. Workshop participants can learn several skills, including: 1) building and troubleshoot PubMed queries in order to retrieve the literature associated with a gene of interest; 2) identifying key concepts relevant to given themes (such as cell types, diseases, and biological processes); 3) measuring the prevalence of these concepts in the gene literature; 4) extracting key information from relevant articles, and 5) developing a background section or summary on the basis of this information. Finally, trainees can learn to consolidate the structured information captured through this process for presentation via an interactive web application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.