Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448548›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors

Quantitative Analysis of Image Quality in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Imaging for COVID-19 Patients.

Behrooz Ghane, Alireza Karimian, Samaneh Mostafapour, Faezeh Gholamiankhak, Seyedjafar Shojaerazavi, Hossein Arabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Behrooz GhaneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza KarimianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Samaneh MostafapourDepartment of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Faezeh GholamiankhakDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Seyedjafar ShojaerazaviDepartment of Cardiology, Ghaem Hospital Mashhad, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography (CT) scan is one of the main tools to diagnose and grade COVID-19 progression. To avoid the side effects of CT imaging, low-dose CT imaging is of crucial importance to reduce population absorbed dose. However, this approach introduces considerable noise levels in CT images. Methods: In this light, we set out to simulate four reduced dose levels (60% dose, 40% dose, 20% dose, and 10% dose) of standard CT imaging using Beer-Lambert's law across 49 patients infected with COVID-19. Then, three denoising filters, namely Gaussian, bilateral, and median, were applied to the different low-dose CT images, the quality of which was assessed prior to and after the application of the various filters via calculation of peak signal-to-noise ratio, root mean square error (RMSE), structural similarity index measure, and relative CT-value bias, separately for the lung tissue and whole body. Results: The quantitative evaluation indicated that 10%-dose CT images have inferior quality (with RMSE = 322.1 ± 104.0 HU and bias = 11.44% ± 4.49% in the lung) even after the application of the denoising filters. The bilateral filter exhibited superior performance to suppress the noise and recover the underlying signals in low-dose CT images compared to the other denoising techniques. The bilateral filter led to RMSE and bias of 100.21 ± 16.47 HU and - 0.21% ± 1.20%, respectively, in the lung regions for 20%-dose CT images compared to the Gaussian filter with RMSE = 103.46 ± 15.70 HU and bias = 1.02% ± 1.68% and median filter with RMSE = 129.60 ± 18.09 HU and bias = -6.15% ± 2.24%. Conclusions: The 20%-dose CT imaging followed by the bilateral filtering introduced a reasonable compromise between image quality and patient dose reduction.

Indexed as

COVID-19denoising filtersimage qualitylow-dose computed tomographypatient dose

Identifiers

PMID37448548
PMCPMC10336910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.