ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors
Demarcating Z-line and Gastric Folds Boundary Based on the Segmentation of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter Images.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The endoscopic diagnosis of pathological changes in the gastroesophageal junction including esophagitis and Barrett's mucosa is based on the visual detection of two boundaries: mucosal color change between esophagus and stomach, and top endpoint of gastric folds. The presence and pattern of mucosal breaks in the gastroesophageal mucosal junction (Z line) classify esophagitis in patients and the distance between the two boundaries points to the possible columnar lined epithelium. Since visual detection may suffer from intra- and interobserver variability, our objective was to define the boundaries automatically based on image processing algorithms, which may enable us to measure the detentions of changes in future studies. Methods: To demarcate the Z-line, first the artifacts of endoscopy images are eliminated. In the second step, using SUSAN edge detector, Mahalanobis distance criteria, and Gabor filter bank, an initial contour is estimated for the Z-line. Using region-based active contours, this initial contour converges to the Z-line. Finally, by applying morphological operators and Gabor Filter Bank to the region inside of the Z-line, gastric folds are segmented. Results: To evaluate the results, a database consisting of 50 images and their ground truths were collected. The average dice coefficient and mean square error of Z-line segmentation were 0.93 and 3.3, respectively. Furthermore, the average boundary distance criteria are 12.3 pixels. In addition, two other criteria that compare the segmentation of folds with several ground truths, i.e., Sweet-Spot Coverage and Jaccard Index for Golden Standard, are 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. Conclusions: Considering the results, automatic segmentation of Z-line and gastric folds are matched to the ground truths with appropriate accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.