Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Survival results according to Oncotype Dx recurrence score in patients with hormone receptor positive HER-2 negative early-stage breast cancer: first multicenter Oncotype Dx recurrence score survival data of Turkey.

Çağlar Ünal, Tolga Özmen, Çetin Ordu, Kezban Nur Pilanci, Ahmet Serkan İlgün, Erhan Gökmen, Elvina Almuradova, Mustafa Özdoğan, Nilüfer Güler, Cihan Uras and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Çağlar ÜnalDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Tolga ÖzmenDivision of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Çetin OrduDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Kezban Nur PilanciDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Memorial Bahçelievler Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ahmet Serkan İlgünDepartment of Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Erhan GökmenDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye.
Elvina AlmuradovaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tınaztepe Galen Bayraklı Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Mustafa ÖzdoğanDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Nilüfer GülerDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Türkiye.
Cihan UrasDepartment of General Surgery, Acıbadem University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Halil KaraDepartment of General Surgery, Acıbadem University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Orhan DemircanDepartment of General Surgery, Çukurova University School of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.
Selver IşıkDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Gül AlçoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Pınar SaipDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, İstanbul University Institute of Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Esra AydınDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, İstanbul University Institute of Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Tomris DuymazDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul Bilgi University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Filiz ÇelebiDepartment of Radiology, Yeditepe University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Kanay YararbaşDepartment of Medical Genetics, Demiroglu Bilim University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Gursel SoybirDepartment of General Surgery, Memorial Şişli Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Vahit OzmenDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Oncotype Dx recurrence score (ODx-RS) guides the adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making process for patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER-2 receptor-negative breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate survival and its correlation with ODx-RS in pT1-2, N0-N1mic patients treated with adjuvant therapy based on tumor board decisions. Patients and methods: Estrogen-positive HER-2 negative early-stage breast cancer patients (pT1-2 N0, N1mic) with known ODx-RS, operated on between 2010 and 2014, were included in this study. The primary aim was to evaluate 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates according to ODX-RS. Results: A total of 203 eligible patients were included in the study, with a median age of 48 (range 26-75) and median follow-up of 84 (range 23-138) months. ROC curve analysis for all patients revealed a recurrence cut-off age of 45 years, prompting evaluation by grouping patients as ≤45 years vs. >45 years. No significant difference in five-year DFS rates was observed between the endocrine-only (ET) and chemo-endocrine (CE) groups. However, among the ET group, DFS was higher in patients over 45 years compared to those aged ≤45 years. When stratifying by ODx-RS as 0-17 and ≥18, DFS was significantly higher in the former group within the ET group. However, such differences were not seen in the CE group. In the ET group, an ODx-RS ≥18 and menopausal status were identified as independent factors affecting survival, with only an ODx-RS ≥18 impacting DFS in patients aged ≤45 years. The ROC curve analysis for this subgroup found the ODx-RS cut-off to be 18. Conclusion: This first multicenter Oncotype Dx survival analysis in Turkey demonstrates the importance of Oncotype Dx recurrence score and age in determining treatment strategies for early-stage breast cancer patients. As a different aproach to the literature, our findings suggest that the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy in young patients (≤45 years) with Oncotype Dx recurrence scores of ≥18 improves DFS.

Indexed as

21 genesclinicopathologic characteristicsearly-stage breast cancerlymph node-negativeOncotype DX®recurrence score

Identifiers

PMID37448522
PMCPMC10338087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.