Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448487›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2023

Automated analysis of unstructured clinical assessments improves emergency department triage performance: A retrospective deep learning analysis.

Dana R Sax, E Margaret Warton, Oleg Sofrygin, Dustin G Mark, Dustin W Ballard, Mamata V Kene, David R Vinson, Mary E Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dana R SaxDepartment of Emergency Medicine Kaiser East Bay and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9061-7746
E Margaret WartonKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-3947
Oleg SofryginUber San Francisco California USA.
Dustin G MarkDepartment of Emergency Medicine Kaiser East Bay and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-7228
Dustin W BallardDepartment of Emergency Medicine Kaiser San Rafael and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-8794
Mamata V KeneDepartment of Emergency Medicine Kaiser San Rafael and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7493-8438
David R VinsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine Roseville, and Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-1858
Mary E ReedKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Oakland California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-1016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Efficient and accurate emergency department (ED) triage is critical to prioritize the sickest patients and manage department flow. We explored the use of electronic health record data and advanced predictive analytics to improve triage performance. Methods: Using a data set of over 5 million ED encounters of patients 18 years and older across 21 EDs from 2016 to 2020, we derived triage models using deep learning to predict 2 outcomes: hospitalization (primary outcome) and fast-track eligibility (exploratory outcome), defined as ED discharge with <2 resource types used (eg, laboratory or imaging studies) and no critical events (eg, resuscitative medications use or intensive care unit [ICU] admission). We report area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for models using (1) triage variables alone (demographics and vital signs), (2) triage nurse clinical assessment alone (unstructured notes), and (3) triage variables plus clinical assessment for each prediction target. Results: We found 12.7% of patients were hospitalized ( Conclusion: Our findings highlight the potential to use advanced predictive analytics to accurately predict key ED triage outcomes. Predictive accuracy was optimized when clinical assessments were added to models using simple structured variables alone.

Identifiers

PMID37448487
PMCPMC10337523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.