ArticleLearning health systems2023
Developing a highly-reliable learning health system.
Article in Learning health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Record Abstraction for Quality Improvement in Sepsis Care Using Artificial Intelligence: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Scribes on Clinician Experience and Efficiency among Pediatric Subspecialists: A Rapid, Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Trial
- Evaluating health organization readiness for implementing a learning health system: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Learning health system strategies in the AI era.npj health systems · 2025Review
- Integrating clinical research into electronic health record workflows to support a learning health system.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Integrated Genomic and Social Network Analyses of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the Healthcare Setting.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Progress with the Learning Health System 2.0: a rapid review of Learning Health Systems' responses to pandemics and climate change.BMC medicine · 2024Review
- An Automated System for Physician Trainee Procedure Logging via Electronic Health Records.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Developing a highly-reliable learning health system.Learning health systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple independent frameworks to support continuous improvement have been proposed to guide healthcare organizations. Two of the most visible are High-reliability Health care, (Chassin et al., 2013) which is emphasized by The Joint Commission, and Learning Health Systems, (Institute of Medicine, 2011) highlighted by the National Academy of Medicine. We propose that organizations consider tightly linking these two models, creating a "Highly-reliable Learning Health System." We describe several efforts at our organization that has resulted from this combined model and have helped our organization weather the COVID-19 pandemic. The organizational changes created using this framework will enable our health system to support a culture of quality across our teams and better fulfill our tripartite mission of high-quality care, effective education of trainees, and dissemination of important innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.