Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448389›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Effect of Lung Compliance-Based Optimum Pressure Versus Fixed Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Lung Atelectasis Assessed by Modified Lung Ultrasound Score in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Deeparaj L, Rakesh Kumar, Nishant Patel, Arshad Ayub, Vimi Rewari, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Kallol Kumar Roy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07613177 (Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07613177 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Level on Postoperative Oxygenation and Lung Aeration Assessed by Lung Ultrasound Monitoring: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (ULTRASVENT-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMoscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"Ran2026 to 2026Enrolled360ConditionsPostoperative Complications, Respiratory Insufficiency, Pulmonary Atelectasis, Positive-End Expiratory PressureArmsIntraoperative Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Regulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deeparaj LAnesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Rakesh KumarAnesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Nishant PatelAnesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Arshad AyubAnesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Vimi RewariAnesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Rajeshwari SubramaniamAnesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Kallol Kumar RoyObstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung protective ventilation during the intraoperative period is now well established. However, the additional role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the intraoperative period remains uncertain in major laparoscopic gynecological surgery. The authors hypothesized that compliance-based optimum PEEP titration reduces postoperative lung atelectasis and improves outcomes.

methodsPatients undergoing major laparoscopic pelvic gynecological surgeries with healthy lungs were randomized to the fixed PEEP group (PEEP 5 cm H

resultsLung ultrasound score (LUS) 30 minutes after extubation in fixed (Group F) and optimum (Group O) PEEP groups were median (interquartile range {IQR}) 3 (2-3) versus 1 (1-2), p=0.0001. Ventilatory parameters between Group F and Group O after lung recruitment were tidal volume (mean 357 mL {SD: 35} versus 362 mL {SD: 22}, p=0.46), PEEP (median, 5 cm H

conclusionsThe modified lung ultrasound score significantly differed intraoperatively between the two groups, with lower scores in the optimum PEEP group. This has reflected improved postoperative outcomes in optimum PEEP group patients, with fewer patients requiring postoperative oxygen supplementation and reduced supplemental oxygen requirement duration.

Indexed as

laparoscopic gynecological surgerylung atelectasislung ultrasound scoreoptimum peeppostoperative pulmonary complication

Identifiers

PMID37448389
PMCPMC10336472
OpenAlexW4380371233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.