Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37448360›Full record

ArticleCurrent computer-aided drug design2024

Graph-DTI: A New Model for Drug-target Interaction Prediction Based on Heterogenous Network Graph Embedding.

Xiaohan Qu, Guoxia Du, Jing Hu, Yongming Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current computer-aided drug design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MTGGF: A Metabolism Type-Aware Graph Generative Model for Molecular Metabolite Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaohan QuSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoxia DuSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing HuSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yongming CaiSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515010783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we aimed to develop a new end-to-end learning model called Graph-Drug-Target Interaction (DTI), which integrates various types of information in the heterogeneous network data, and to explore automatic learning of the topology-maintaining representations of drugs and targets, thereby effectively contributing to the prediction of DTI. Precise predictions of DTI can guide drug discovery and development. Most machine learning algorithms integrate multiple data sources and combine them with common embedding methods. However, the relationship between the drugs and target proteins is not well reported. Although some existing studies have used heterogeneous network graphs for DTI prediction, there are many limitations in the neighborhood information between the nodes in the heterogeneous network graphs. We studied the drug-drug interaction (DDI) and DTI from DrugBank Version 3.0, protein-protein interaction (PPI) from the human protein reference database Release 9, drug structure similarity from Morgan fingerprints of radius 2 and calculated by RDKit, and protein sequence similarity from Smith-Waterman score.

methodsOur study consists of three major components. First, various drugs and target proteins were integrated, and a heterogeneous network was established based on a series of data sets. Second, the graph neural networks-inspired graph auto-encoding method was used to extract high-order structural information from the heterogeneous networks, thereby revealing the description of nodes (drugs and proteins) and their topological neighbors. Finally, potential DTI prediction was made, and the obtained samples were sent to the classifier for secondary classification.

resultsThe performance of Graph-DTI and all baseline methods was evaluated using the sums of the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The results indicated that Graph-DTI outperformed the baseline methods in both performance results.

conclusionCompared with other baseline DTI prediction methods, the results showed that Graph-DTI had better prediction performance. Additionally, in this study, we effectively classified drugs corresponding to different targets and vice versa. The above findings showed that Graph-DTI provided a powerful tool for drug research, development, and repositioning. Graph- DTI can serve as a drug development and repositioning tool more effectively than previous studies that did not use heterogeneous network graph embedding.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDatabases, PharmaceuticalDatabases, ProteinDrug DiscoveryHumansMachine LearningPharmaceutical PreparationsProtein Interaction MapsProteinsPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsbioinformatics databasesclassifier design and evaluationDeep learningdrug developmentfeature representationtopology.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.