ArticleCurrent computer-aided drug design2024
Graph-DTI: A New Model for Drug-target Interaction Prediction Based on Heterogenous Network Graph Embedding.
Article in Current computer-aided drug design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein and ligand novelty in drug-target interaction prediction: a dual-encoder fusion strategy for more interpretable and generalizable modeling.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The impact of AI on modern oncology from early detection to personalized cancer treatment.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- CAMF-DTI: Enhancing Drug-Target Interaction Prediction via Coordinate Attention and Multi-Scale Feature Fusion.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- MAMGN-HTI: A Graph Neural Network Model with Metapath and Attention Mechanisms for Hyperthyroidism Herb-Target Interaction Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- MTGGF: A Metabolism Type-Aware Graph Generative Model for Molecular Metabolite Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Integrating data augmentation and BERT-based deep learning for predicting alpha-glucosidase inhibitors derived from Black Cohosh.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence In Drug-target Interactions Prediction: A Review.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prediction model and web calculator for postoperative LDVT in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Hybrid Class Balancing Approach for Chemical Compound Toxicity Prediction.Current computer-aided drug design · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in traditional Chinese medicine: advances in multi-metabolite multi-target interaction modeling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Sex differences and testosterone interfere with the structure of the gut microbiota through the bile acid signaling pathway.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we aimed to develop a new end-to-end learning model called Graph-Drug-Target Interaction (DTI), which integrates various types of information in the heterogeneous network data, and to explore automatic learning of the topology-maintaining representations of drugs and targets, thereby effectively contributing to the prediction of DTI. Precise predictions of DTI can guide drug discovery and development. Most machine learning algorithms integrate multiple data sources and combine them with common embedding methods. However, the relationship between the drugs and target proteins is not well reported. Although some existing studies have used heterogeneous network graphs for DTI prediction, there are many limitations in the neighborhood information between the nodes in the heterogeneous network graphs. We studied the drug-drug interaction (DDI) and DTI from DrugBank Version 3.0, protein-protein interaction (PPI) from the human protein reference database Release 9, drug structure similarity from Morgan fingerprints of radius 2 and calculated by RDKit, and protein sequence similarity from Smith-Waterman score.
methodsOur study consists of three major components. First, various drugs and target proteins were integrated, and a heterogeneous network was established based on a series of data sets. Second, the graph neural networks-inspired graph auto-encoding method was used to extract high-order structural information from the heterogeneous networks, thereby revealing the description of nodes (drugs and proteins) and their topological neighbors. Finally, potential DTI prediction was made, and the obtained samples were sent to the classifier for secondary classification.
resultsThe performance of Graph-DTI and all baseline methods was evaluated using the sums of the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The results indicated that Graph-DTI outperformed the baseline methods in both performance results.
conclusionCompared with other baseline DTI prediction methods, the results showed that Graph-DTI had better prediction performance. Additionally, in this study, we effectively classified drugs corresponding to different targets and vice versa. The above findings showed that Graph-DTI provided a powerful tool for drug research, development, and repositioning. Graph- DTI can serve as a drug development and repositioning tool more effectively than previous studies that did not use heterogeneous network graph embedding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37448360What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.