ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2023
An evaluation of the use and efficacy of behavioural therapy when treating paediatric patients with radiation therapy.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the positional reproducibility of sedation versus non-sedation state in pediatric radiotherapy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Supporting paediatric patients to receive radiation therapy without sedation or general anaesthetic.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe paediatric radiation therapy group (PRTG) provided a multidisciplinary network to support patients accessing radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to evaluate the use and efficacy of behaviour therapy practices used by the PRTG.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional review of general anaesthetic (GA) utilisation for paediatric patients was completed between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2014. The PRTG incorporated behavioural therapy techniques into all appointments but offered additional play appointments to children unable to comply with the requirements of RT. This aimed to increase their compliance and minimise GA use.
resultsTwo-hundred and seventy-four patients had 5402 occasions of service, of which 1361 were delivered under GA (25.2%). Two-hundred and fifty-seven patients met the eligibility criteria. Patients under 8 years who required GA for their entire treatment reduced for each year of increase in age (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.51, P < 0.001). Participants 3 years and younger were shown not as likely to change their GA requirements with the use of play appointments. Seventy-eight per cent (83/106) of 3-8-year-olds used no GA or ceased GA during treatment.
conclusionsMost paediatric patients <3 years will gain minimal benefit to reduce GA use from additional play appointments. Children older than nine were not likely to require play appointments to be compliant with RT. Encouragingly, 53.3% of 3-8-year-olds who were categorised as full GA after CT planning did not continue to a full course of GA due to the behavioural therapy interventions of the PRTG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.