Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447988›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Vision-Based Methods for Food and Fluid Intake Monitoring: A Literature Review.

Xin Chen, Ernest N Kamavuako

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Image-Based Volume Estimation for Food in a Bowl.Journal of food engineering · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xin ChenDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-6744
Ernest N KamavuakoDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6846-2090
King's College London · GB

Funding

China Scholarship Council and King's College London 202106350041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food and fluid intake monitoring are essential for reducing the risk of dehydration, malnutrition, and obesity. The existing research has been preponderantly focused on dietary monitoring, while fluid intake monitoring, on the other hand, is often neglected. Food and fluid intake monitoring can be based on wearable sensors, environmental sensors, smart containers, and the collaborative use of multiple sensors. Vision-based intake monitoring methods have been widely exploited with the development of visual devices and computer vision algorithms. Vision-based methods provide non-intrusive solutions for monitoring. They have shown promising performance in food/beverage recognition and segmentation, human intake action detection and classification, and food volume/fluid amount estimation. However, occlusion, privacy, computational efficiency, and practicality pose significant challenges. This paper reviews the existing work (253 articles) on vision-based intake (food and fluid) monitoring methods to assess the size and scope of the available literature and identify the current challenges and research gaps. This paper uses tables and graphs to depict the patterns of device selection, viewing angle, tasks, algorithms, experimental settings, and performance of the existing monitoring systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrinkingBeveragesDietFoodHumansdietary monitoringdrinking action detectionintake monitoringvision-based methods

Identifiers

PMID37447988
PMCPMC10346353
OpenAlexW4383262597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.