Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447951›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Assessing Upper Limb Function in Breast Cancer Survivors Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning in a Free-Living Environment.

Nieke Vets, An De Groef, Kaat Verbeelen, Nele Devoogdt, Ann Smeets, Dieter Van Assche, Liesbet De Baets, Jill Emmerzaal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nieke VetsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
An De GroefDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Kaat VerbeelenCarEdOn Research Group, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Nele DevoogdtDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8117-7080
Ann SmeetsKU Leuven, Department of Oncology, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Dieter Van AsscheDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-0106
Liesbet De BaetsPain in Motion International Research Group, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-2090
Jill EmmerzaalDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-7604
KU Leuven · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

KU Leuven 3M210654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Being able to objectively assess upper limb (UL) dysfunction in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is an emerging issue. This study aims to determine the accuracy of a pre-trained lab-based machine learning model (MLM) to distinguish functional from non-functional arm movements in a home situation in BCS. (2) Methods: Participants performed four daily life activities while wearing two wrist accelerometers and being video recorded. To define UL functioning, video data were annotated and accelerometer data were analyzed using a counts threshold method and an MLM. Prediction accuracy, recall, sensitivity, f1-score, 'total minutes functional activity' and 'percentage functionally active' were considered. (3) Results: Despite a good MLM accuracy (0.77-0.90), recall, and specificity, the f1-score was poor. An overestimation of the 'total minutes functional activity' and 'percentage functionally active' was found by the MLM. Between the video-annotated data and the functional activity determined by the MLM, the mean differences were 0.14% and 0.10% for the left and right side, respectively. For the video-annotated data versus the counts threshold method, the mean differences were 0.27% and 0.24%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: An MLM is a better alternative than the counts threshold method for distinguishing functional from non-functional arm movements. However, the abovementioned wrist accelerometer-based assessment methods overestimate UL functional activity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryFemaleHumansMachine LearningUpper Extremityaccelerometryactigraphyactivities of daily livingbreast neoplasmsfunctional activitymachine learningupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID37447951
PMCPMC10347074
OpenAlexW4382936640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.