Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447948›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning Models for Stress Analysis in University Students: A Sudoku-Based Study.

Qicheng Chen, Boon Giin Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qicheng ChenSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.
Boon Giin LeeNottingham Ningbo China Beacons of Excellence Research and Innovation Institute, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5743-1010

Funding

Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau Z2021Z037Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation LQ21F020024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the phenomenon of "involution" in China, the current generation of college and university students are experiencing escalating levels of stress, both academically and within their families. Extensive research has shown a strong correlation between heightened stress levels and overall well-being decline. Therefore, monitoring students' stress levels is crucial for improving their well-being in educational institutions and at home. Previous studies have primarily focused on recognizing emotions and detecting stress using physiological signals like ECG and EEG. However, these studies often relied on video clips to induce various emotional states, which may not be suitable for university students who already face additional stress to excel academically. In this study, a series of experiments were conducted to evaluate students' stress levels by engaging them in playing Sudoku games under different distracting conditions. The collected physiological signals, including PPG, ECG, and EEG, were analyzed using enhanced models such as LRCN and self-supervised CNN to assess stress levels. The outcomes were compared with participants' self-reported stress levels after the experiments. The findings demonstrate that the enhanced models presented in this study exhibit a high level of proficiency in assessing stress levels. Notably, when subjects were presented with Sudoku-solving tasks accompanied by noisy or discordant audio, the models achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 95.13% and an F1-score of 93.72%. Additionally, when subjects engaged in Sudoku-solving activities with another individual monitoring the process, the models achieved a commendable accuracy rate of 97.76% and an F1-score of 96.67%. Finally, under comforting conditions, the models achieved an exceptional accuracy rate of 98.78% with an F1-score of 95.39%.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEmotionsHumansSelf ReportStudentsUniversitiesdeep learningsignal processingstress detectionwearable sensing

Identifiers

PMID37447948
PMCPMC10347184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.