Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447841›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

IoT Data Quality Assessment Framework Using Adaptive Weighted Estimation Fusion.

John Byabazaire, Gregory M P O'Hare, Rem Collier, Declan Delaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John ByabazaireSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4219-1912
Gregory M P O'HareSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5124-1686
Rem CollierSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0319-0797
Declan DelaneySchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7028-3307

Funding

SFI Strategic Partnership Programme and co-funded by Origin Enterprises plc 16/S/3296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely data quality assessment has been shown to be crucial for the development of IoT-based applications. Different IoT applications' varying data quality requirements pose a challenge, as each application requires a unique data quality process. This creates scalability issues as the number of applications increases, and it also has financial implications, as it would require a separate data pipeline for each application. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a novel approach integrating fusion methods into end-to-end data quality assessment to cater to different applications within a single data pipeline. By using real-time and historical analytics, the study investigates the effects of each fusion method on the resulting data quality score and how this can be used to support different applications. The study results, based on two real-world datasets, indicate that Kalman fusion had a higher overall mean quality score than Adaptive weighted fusion and Naïve fusion. However, Kalman fusion also had a higher computational burden on the system. The proposed solution offers a flexible and efficient approach to addressing IoT applications' diverse data quality needs within a single data pipeline.

Indexed as

big data modeldata fusiondata qualityinternet of things (IoT)trust

Identifiers

PMID37447841
PMCPMC10346167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.