Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447817›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Methodology for In-Well Multiphase Flow Measurement with Strategically Positioned Local and/or Distributed Acoustic Sensors.

Ömer Haldun Ünalmis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ömer Haldun ÜnalmisWeatherford, Houston, TX 77041, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-6998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new three-phase downhole flow measurement methodology is developed based on measurements of speed of sound at different locations along the well, where the pressure is greater than the bubble-point pressure at the first location and smaller at the second location. A bulk velocity measurement is also required at the second location. The fluid at the first location is a mixture of two phases, but becomes a mixture of three phases at the second location due to the liberation of gas from the oil phase. The flow equations are first solved for two-phase flow at the first location to obtain the first phase fraction, water-in-liquid ratio, and then this information is fed into the flow equations after adjustment to the local pressure and temperature conditions to solve for three-phase flow at the second location to obtain the second phase fraction, namely the liquid volume fraction. These two phase fractions along with the bulk velocity at the second location are sufficient to calculate the three-phase flow rates. The methodology is fully explained and the analytical solutions for three-phase flow measurement is explicitly provided in a step-by-step process. A Lego-like approach may be used with various sensor technologies to obtain the required measurements, although distributed acoustic sensing systems and optical flowmeters are ideal to easily and efficiently adopt the current methodology. This game-changing new methodology for measuring downhole three-phase flow can be implemented in existing wells with an optical infrastructure by adding a topside optoelectronics system.

Indexed as

AcousticsWaterTemperatureUltrasonographyWaterdistributed acoustic sensing (DAS)downhole flow measurementfiber-optic measurementsmultiphase flowsound speed measurement

Identifiers

PMID37447817
PMCPMC10346581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.