ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Novel Calibration Method of Line Structured Light Plane Using Spatial Geometry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plate Wall Offset Measurement for U-Shaped Groove Workpieces Based on Multi-Line-Structured Light Vision Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The line structured light plane calibration method using a plane target cannot produce satisfactory calibration results due to inaccurate positioning of the calibrated points. Field of view noise and sensor noise affect the target light stripe extraction and camera parameter calculation during the calibration process. These factors will cause the calculation of the coordinates of the calibrated point to deviate, and thus affect the light plane calibration. To solve this problem, we propose a new method to calculate the calibrated point based on spatial geometry. Firstly, for the projection line corresponding to the feature point on the light stripe and the corresponding line on the target, a common perpendicular of these two lines above is established, and since the sum of the squares of the distances from the midpoint to the two straight lines is the smallest, the midpoint of the common perpendicular is taken as the calibrated point. Secondly, the target is moved to different positions, and the non-collinear calibrated points are calculated. Finally, the parameters of the light plane are obtained by fitting these calibrated points. This method requires only a checkerboard target, and has a simple calibration process. The experimental results show that the average error of the calibration method proposed in this paper is 0.011 mm, which is less than the 0.031 mm of the calibration method based on the plane target with cross-ratio invariant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.