Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447777›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Novel Calibration Method of Line Structured Light Plane Using Spatial Geometry.

Huiping Gao, Guili Xu, Zhongchen Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huiping GaoCollege of Automation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangjun Road, Nanjing 211106, China.
Guili XuCollege of Automation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangjun Road, Nanjing 211106, China.
Zhongchen MaSchool of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, Jiangsu University, Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62006098National Natural Science Foundation of China 62073161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The line structured light plane calibration method using a plane target cannot produce satisfactory calibration results due to inaccurate positioning of the calibrated points. Field of view noise and sensor noise affect the target light stripe extraction and camera parameter calculation during the calibration process. These factors will cause the calculation of the coordinates of the calibrated point to deviate, and thus affect the light plane calibration. To solve this problem, we propose a new method to calculate the calibrated point based on spatial geometry. Firstly, for the projection line corresponding to the feature point on the light stripe and the corresponding line on the target, a common perpendicular of these two lines above is established, and since the sum of the squares of the distances from the midpoint to the two straight lines is the smallest, the midpoint of the common perpendicular is taken as the calibrated point. Secondly, the target is moved to different positions, and the non-collinear calibrated points are calculated. Finally, the parameters of the light plane are obtained by fitting these calibrated points. This method requires only a checkerboard target, and has a simple calibration process. The experimental results show that the average error of the calibration method proposed in this paper is 0.011 mm, which is less than the 0.031 mm of the calibration method based on the plane target with cross-ratio invariant.

Indexed as

least square principleplane targetspatial geometrystructured light plane calibration

Identifiers

PMID37447777
PMCPMC10346729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.