Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447736›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A High-Density EEG Study Investigating the Neural Correlates of Continuity Editing Theory in VR Films.

Wanqiu Cheng, Xuefei Wang, Jiahui Zou, Mingxuan Li, Feng Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wanqiu ChengShanghai Film Academy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China.
Xuefei WangShanghai Film Academy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China.
Jiahui ZouShanghai Film Academy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China.
Mingxuan LiShanghai Film Academy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China.
Feng TianShanghai Film Academy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China.

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China No. 17BC043.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a cognitive psychology experiment to explore the differences between 2D and virtual reality (VR) film editing techniques. We recruited sixteen volunteers to view a range of different display modes and edit types of experimental material. An electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded simultaneously while the participants watched. Subjective results showed that the VR mode reflects higher load scores, particularly in the effort dimension. Different editing types have no effect on subjective immersion scores. The VR mode elicited stronger EEG energy, with differences concentrated in the occipital, parietal, and central regions. On the basis of this, visual evoked potential (VEP) analyses were conducted, and the results indicated that VR mode triggered greater spatial attention, while editing in 2D mode induced stronger semantic updating and active understanding. Furthermore, we found that while the effect of different edit types in both display modes is similar, cross-axis editing triggered greater cognitive violations than continuity editing, which could serve as scientific theoretical support for the development of future VR film editing techniques.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualVirtual RealityAttentionElectroencephalographyHumansMotion Picturesattentional theory of continuity editingelectroencephalogram (EEG)virtual reality (VR) filmvisual evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID37447736
PMCPMC10346206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.