ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Quantification of Structural Defects Using Pixel Level Spatial Information from Photogrammetry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer Vision Method for Automatic Detection of Microstructure Defects of Concrete.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Threshold-Based BRISQUE-Assisted Deep Learning for Enhancing Crack Detection in Concrete Structures.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging infrastructure has drawn increased attention globally, as its collapse would be destructive economically and socially. Precise quantification of minor defects is essential for identifying issues before structural failure occurs. Most studies measured the dimension of defects at image level, ignoring the third-dimensional information available from close-range photogrammetry. This paper aims to develop an efficient approach to accurately detecting and quantifying minor defects on complicated infrastructures. Pixel sizes of inspection images are estimated using spatial information generated from three-dimensional (3D) point cloud reconstruction. The key contribution of this research is to obtain the actual pixel size within the grided small sections by relating spatial information. To automate the process, deep learning technology is applied to detect and highlight the cracked area at the pixel level. The adopted convolutional neural network (CNN) achieves an F1 score of 0.613 for minor crack extraction. After that, the actual crack dimension can be derived by multiplying the pixel number with the pixel size. Compared with the traditional approach, defects distributed on a complex structure can be estimated with the proposed approach. A pilot case study was conducted on a concrete footpath with cracks distributed on a selected 1500 mm × 1500 mm concrete road section. Overall, 10 out of 88 images are selected for validation; average errors ranging from 0.26 mm to 0.71 mm were achieved for minor cracks under 5 mm, which demonstrates a promising result of the proposed study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.