ArticlePolymers2023
Experimental Investigation on Post-Fire Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Rebars.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars are commonly used as an alternative to conventional steel reinforcement in a variety of structural applications due to their superior low cost, strength-to-weight ratio, and durability. However, their mechanical properties after exposure to elevated temperatures, particularly in fire-prone environments, remain a significant concern. To address this concern, the present study focuses on investigating the residual tensile behavior, specifically the tensile strength and elastic modulus, of GFRP rebars exposed to high temperatures that are realistically encountered during fire incidents. The temperature range considered in this analysis spans from 100 °C to 400 °C, with a heating rate of 20 °C/min. The fire duration of 1 h is used. This comprehensive analysis is essential for enhancing our understanding of the performance and applicability of GFRP rebars in fire-prone environments. Based on their actual application in the construction industry, five specimens of three different rebar sizes (16, 20, and 25 mm) were examined for the effect of rebar size on tensile behavior after fire exposure. In addition, the effects were investigated of air- and water-cooling methods on residual tensile behavior. The nominal tensile strength, elastic modulus, and ultimate strain of GFRP rebars at ambient temperature are 930 MPa, 50.2 GPa and 1.85%, respectively. The test results indicated that as the temperature increased to 400 °C, the ultimate tensile strength of the GFRP bars decreased by up to 55%, while the ultimate strain increased by up to 44%, regardless of the cooling method. In addition, when rebars of sizes 16-25 mm were subjected to a 400 °C fire treatment, the smaller the rebar, the greater the percentage of ultimate tensile and strain reduction. These findings hold great significance for the utilization of GFRP bars within the construction industry. This study offers valuable insights into the design of fire-resilient structures, emphasizing the importance of considering rebar size and cooling methods due to their impact on the post-fire tensile strength and strain of GFRP rebars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.