Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447463›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

The 3D-Printed (FDM/FFF) Biocomposites Based on Polylactide and Carbonate Lake Sediments-Towards a Circular Economy.

Robert E Przekop, Ewa Gabriel, Marta Dobrosielska, Agnieszka Martyła, Paulina Jakubowska, Julia Głowacka, Piotr Marciniak, Daria Pakuła, Marek Jałbrzykowski, Grzegorz Borkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert E PrzekopCentre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 10 Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.
Ewa GabrielCentre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 10 Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-5893
Marta DobrosielskaFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering Warsaw, University of Technology, 141 Wołoska, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka MartyłaCentre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 10 Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.
Paulina JakubowskaFaculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Technology and Chemical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 4 Berdychowo, 60-965 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8638-1216
Julia GłowackaCentre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 10 Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-6714
Piotr MarciniakCentre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 10 Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.
Daria PakułaCentre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, 10 Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6741-3019
Marek JałbrzykowskiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 45c Wiejska, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
Grzegorz BorkowskiFaculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, 10 B. Krygowskiego, 61-680 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3567-9941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, composites containing polylactide and carbonate lake sediment in concentrations of 2.5, 5, 10, and 15% by weight were prepared by a 3D printing method. The material for 3D printing was obtained by directly diluting the masterbatch on an injection moulder to the desired concentrations, and after granulation, it was extruded into a filament. The material prepared thusly was used to print standardised samples for mechanical testing. To compare the mechanical properties of the composites obtained by 3D printing and injection moulding, two sets of tests were performed, i.e., mechanical tests (tensile strength, flexural strength, and impact strength) and hydrophobic-hydrophilic surface character testing. The degree of composite waste in the 3D printing was also calculated. Mechanical and surface tests were performed for both systems conditioned at room temperature and after accelerated ageing in a weathering chamber. The study showed differences in the properties of composites obtained by 3D printing. Sedimentary fillers improved the hydrophobicity of the systems compared with pure PLA, but it was not a linear relationship. The PLA/CLS sedB composite had higher strength parameters, especially after ageing in a weathering chamber. This is due to its composition, in which, in addition to calcite and silica, there are also aluminosilicates, causing a strengthening of the PLA matrix.

Indexed as

3D printingcarbonate lake sedimentscompositeFDMinjection mouldingPLA

Identifiers

PMID37447463
PMCPMC10346295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.