Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447369›Full record

ReviewNutrients2023

Dietary Strategies for Complementary Feeding between 6 and 24 Months of Age: The Evidence.

Leila Harrison, Zahra Padhani, Rehana Salam, Christina Oh, Komal Rahim, Maria Maqsood, Anna Ali, Kimberly Charbonneau, Emily C Keats, Zohra S Lassi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diet's impact on gut microbial assemblage in health and disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Leila HarrisonCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Zahra PadhaniRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Rehana SalamThe Daffodil Centre-A Joint Venture of Cancer Council and The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Christina OhCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Komal RahimInternal Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0790-6644
Maria MaqsoodCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Anna AliRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7832-1694
Kimberly CharbonneauCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Emily C KeatsCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1354-7086
Zohra S LassiRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Aamer ImdadDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Aatekah OwaisCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Jai DasDivision of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-599X
Hospital for Sick Children · CAThe University of Adelaide · AUAga Khan University · PKAga Khan University Hospital · PKSUNY Upstate Medical University · USThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

World Health Organization 2020/1050195-0 and 2020/1045181-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suboptimal complementary feeding practices remain highly prevent. This review aims to comprehensively synthesize new emerging evidence on a set of topics related to the selection and consumption of complementary foods. We synthesized evidence related to five key topics focused on nutritional interventions that target the complementary feeding period, based on four systematic reviews that include updated evidence to February 2022. While there have been many studies examining interventions during the complementary feeding period, there is an overall lack of relevant information through which to draw conclusions on the ideal feeding schedule by food type. Similarly, few studies have examined the effects of animal milk versus infant formula for non-breastfed infants (6-11 months), though those that did found a greater risk of anemia among infants who were provided cow's milk. This review highlights a number of interventions that are successful at improving micronutrient status and anthropometry during the complementary feeding period, including fortified blended foods, locally and commercially produced supplementary foods, and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements. Complementary feeding education for caregivers can also be used to improve nutrition outcomes among infants in both food secure and insecure populations.

Indexed as

DietInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedHumansInfantInfant FormulaMilkcomplementary feedinginfantsyoung child

Identifiers

PMID37447369
PMCPMC10346638
OpenAlexW4383347474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.