Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447230›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2023

A Randomized Controlled Study to Test Front-of-Pack (FOP) Nutrition Labels in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Soye Shin, Ada Mohammad Alqunaibet, Reem F Alsukait, Amaal Alruwaily, Rasha Abdulrahman Alfawaz, Abdullah Algwizani, Christopher H Herbst, Meera Shekar, Eric A Finkelstein

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Soye ShinProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8856-8236
Ada Mohammad AlqunaibetPublic Health Authority, Riyadh 11176, Saudi Arabia.
Reem F AlsukaitDepartment of Community Health Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.
Amaal AlruwailyPublic Health Authority, Riyadh 11176, Saudi Arabia.
Rasha Abdulrahman AlfawazPublic Health Authority, Riyadh 11176, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlgwizaniPublic Health Authority, Riyadh 11176, Saudi Arabia.
Christopher H HerbstHealth, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, World Bank Group, Washington, DC 20433, USA.
Meera ShekarHealth, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, World Bank Group, Washington, DC 20433, USA.
Eric A FinkelsteinProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGWorld Bank Group · USKing Saud University · SA

Funding

World Bank Group P172148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One common strategy for governments to tackle the non-communicable disease (NCD) epidemic is front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is considering implementing a new FOP label that is based on either France's Nutri-Score (NS), which labels all foods (A = healthiest to E = least healthy) based on overall nutritional quality, or the Chilean warning label (WL) approach, which identifies foods to avoid based on select nutritional characteristics. Using a fully functional online grocery store, this study aimed to test these two promising FOP strategies by randomizing 656 KSA adults into one of the three versions of the store to complete a hypothetical grocery shop: no-label (control), NS, and WL. The NS was modified with a sugar percentage tag given that reducing sugar consumption is one of KSA's public health goals. We found that both modified NS labels and Chilean warning labels positively influenced food and beverage choices among KSA participants, but there were differential effects across the two labels. Relative to the control, NS improved the overall diet quality of the shopping baskets, measured by the weighted (by the number of servings) average NS point (ranging from 0, least healthy, to 55, healthiest), by 2.5 points [95% CI: 1.7, 3.4;

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorNutritional StatusAdultChoice BehaviorFood LabelingFood PreferencesHumansNutritive ValueSaudi ArabiaSugarsSugarsChilean warning labelsdiet qualityfront-of-pack labelingNutri-Scoreonline grocery shopping

Identifiers

PMID37447230
PMCPMC10343722
OpenAlexW4382468299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.