Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37446482›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Modeling and Comparative Analysis of Atmospheric Pressure Anodic Carbon Arc Discharge in Argon and Helium-Producing Carbon Nanostructures.

Almaz Saifutdinov, Boris Timerkaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Almaz SaifutdinovDepartment of General Physics, Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev-KAI, K. Marx St., 10, 420071 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4776-3657
Boris TimerkaevDepartment of General Physics, Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev-KAI, K. Marx St., 10, 420071 Kazan, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-03-2023-032Russian Science Foundation 22-22-20099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, within the framework of a unified model for the discharge gap and electrodes, a comparative numerical analysis was carried out on the effect of evaporation of graphite anode material on the characteristics of the arc discharge in helium and argon. The effect of changing the plasma-forming ion, in which the ion of evaporated atomic carbon becomes the dominant ion, is demonstrated. For an arc discharge in helium, this effect is accompanied by a jump-like change in the dependence of the current density on voltage (CVC), and smoothly for a discharge in argon. With regard to the dynamics of the ignition of an arc discharge, it is shown that during the transition from glow discharge to arc in helium, the discharge parameters are also accompanied by an abrupt change, while in argon, this transition is smooth. This is due to the fact that the ionization potentials, as well as the ionization cross sections, differ significantly for helium and carbon, and are close in value for helium and argon. For various points on the CVC, the density distributions of the charged and neutral particles of an inert gas and evaporated gases are presented.

Indexed as

arc dischargecarbonextended fluid modelunified model

Identifiers

PMID37446482
PMCPMC10343802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.