Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37446474›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Size Uncertainty in Individual Nanoparticles Measured by Single Particle Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.

Shuji Yamashita, Shin-Ichi Miyashita, Takafumi Hirata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuji YamashitaNational Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 3-9, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba 305-8563, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-8658
Shin-Ichi MiyashitaNational Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 3-9, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba 305-8563, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2762-2147
Takafumi HirataGeochemical Research Centre, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry has been used for size measurements of individual nanoparticles (NPs). Here, uncertainties in size analysis based upon two calibration approaches were evaluated: (i) the use of particle size standard and (ii) the use of ion standard solution. For particle size standard approach, the source of uncertainty to determine the target NP diameter was related to the variation in the signal intensities of both target NPs and particle size standard, and the size distribution of the particle size standard. The relative uncertainties of the 50 nm silver NP as the target were 15.0%, 9.9%, and 10.8% when particle size standards of 30 nm, 60 nm, and 100 nm silver NPs were used, respectively. As for the ion standard solution approach, the sources of uncertainty were the concentration of working standard solution, sample flow rate, transport efficiency, slope of calibration curve, and variation in the signal intensity of the ion standard solution and of the target NPs. The relative uncertainties for the 50 nm silver NP were 18.5% for 1 ng/g, 7.6% for 10 ng/g, and 4.7% for 100 ng/g solutions. The lower uncertainty obtained with a high concentration working standard solution is recommended to improve precision on particle size determinations by spICP-MS.

Indexed as

nanoparticlesingle particle ICP-MSsize analysisuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID37446474
PMCPMC10343304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.