Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37446054›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

The Bacterial Spore as a Mucosal Vaccine Delivery System.

Anella Saggese, Loredana Baccigalupi, Giuliana Donadio, Ezio Ricca, Rachele Isticato

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Expression of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Chemical Inactivation ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Preharvest Control ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anella SaggeseDepartment of Biology, Federico II University, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Loredana BaccigalupiDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giuliana DonadioDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
Ezio RiccaDepartment of Biology, Federico II University, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7355-0332
Rachele IsticatoDepartment of Biology, Federico II University, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-4038
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of efficient mucosal vaccines is strongly dependent on the use of appropriate vectors. Various biological systems or synthetic nanoparticles have been proposed to display and deliver antigens to mucosal surfaces. The

Indexed as

BacillusVaccinesAnimalsAntigensBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDrug Delivery SystemsSpores, BacterialAntigensBacterial ProteinsVaccinesBacillus subtilismucosal vaccinessporesspore surface displayvaccine delivery

Identifiers

PMID37446054
PMCPMC10341597
OpenAlexW4382787758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.