ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Comparative Analysis of Cell Mixtures Deconvolution and Gene Signatures Generated for Blood, Immune and Cancer Cells.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Yiqi Huoxue Jiedu formula protects against sepsis-associated lung injury by modulating macrophage mitophagy and mtDNA-STING signaling.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
- A nonparametric statistical method for deconvolving densities in the analysis of proteomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Case Report: dynamic monocyte reprogramming during ALSS therapy in type B HBV-ACLF revealed by single-cell transcriptomics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of reference-free transcriptomic deconvolution highlights the importance of biological validation in astrocytes across Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Tumor Microenvironment Composition Using Bulk Transcriptomics: A Guide to Recent Advances and Open Challenges.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Unveiling tissue heterogeneity through genomic interaction-encoded image representation of RNA-sequencing data.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- High tumor glucocorticoid receptor expression in early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer is associated with increased T-regulatory cell infiltration.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Blood toxicogenomics reveals potential biomarkers for management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Deconvolution analysis identified altered hepatic cell landscape in primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cholangitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Blood cell indices and inflammation-related markers with kidney cancer risk: a large-population prospective analysis in UK Biobank.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- CATD: a reproducible pipeline for selecting cell-type deconvolution methods across tissues.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the last two decades, many detailed full transcriptomic studies on complex biological samples have been published and included in large gene expression repositories. These studies primarily provide a bulk expression signal for each sample, including multiple cell-types mixed within the global signal. The cellular heterogeneity in these mixtures does not allow the activity of specific genes in specific cell types to be identified. Therefore, inferring relative cellular composition is a very powerful tool to achieve a more accurate molecular profiling of complex biological samples. In recent decades, computational techniques have been developed to solve this problem by applying deconvolution methods, designed to decompose cell mixtures into their cellular components and calculate the relative proportions of these elements. Some of them only calculate the cell proportions (supervised methods), while other deconvolution algorithms can also identify the gene signatures specific for each cell type (unsupervised methods). In these work, five deconvolution methods (CIBERSORT, FARDEEP, DECONICA, LINSEED and ABIS) were implemented and used to analyze blood and immune cells, and also cancer cells, in complex mixture samples (using three bulk expression datasets). Our study provides three analytical tools (corrplots, cell-signature plots and bar-mixture plots) that allow a thorough comparative analysis of the cell mixture data. The work indicates that CIBERSORT is a robust method optimized for the identification of immune cell-types, but not as efficient in the identification of cancer cells. We also found that LINSEED is a very powerful unsupervised method that provides precise and specific gene signatures for each of the main immune cell types tested: neutrophils and monocytes (of the myeloid lineage), B-cells, NK cells and T-cells (of the lymphoid lineage), and also for cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.