Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37445943›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Gene Therapy Approaches for the Treatment of Hemophilia B.

Anastasiia B Soroka, Sofya G Feoktistova, Olga N Mityaeva, Pavel Y Volchkov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. The Epigenetic Landscape of Hemophilia.Current molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a novel gene editing lexicon for hemophilia: methodology and results.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. CRISPR/Cas9 Edition of theLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anastasiia B SorokaLife Sciences Research Center, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141700 Dolgoprudniy, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-1575
Sofya G FeoktistovaLife Sciences Research Center, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141700 Dolgoprudniy, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-439X
Olga N MityaevaLife Sciences Research Center, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141700 Dolgoprudniy, Russia.
Pavel Y VolchkovLife Sciences Research Center, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National Research University, 141700 Dolgoprudniy, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9794-6297

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-64-00002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the standard enzyme-replacement therapy, administered from once per 7-14 days to 2-3 times a week in patients with severe hemophilia B, as a result of a single injection, gene therapy can restore F9 gene expression and maintain it for a prolonged time. In clinical research, the approach of delivering a functional copy of a gene using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is widely used. The scientific community is actively researching possible modifications to improve delivery efficiency and expression. In preclinical studies, the possibility of genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 technology for the treatment of hemophilia B is also being actively studied.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AHemophilia BDependovirusFactor IXGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansFactor IXAAVblood coagulation factor IXgene therapygenome editinghemophilia Bhemostasis

Identifiers

PMID37445943
PMCPMC10341900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.