ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Retinal Responses to Visual Stimuli in Interphotoreceptor Retinoid Binding-Protein Knock-Out Mice.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conditional Knockouts of Interphotoreceptor Retinoid Binding Protein Suggest Two Independent Mechanisms for Retinal Degeneration and Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) is an abundant glycoprotein in the subretinal space bound by the photoreceptor (PR) outer segments and the processes of the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE). IRBP binds retinoids, including 11-cis-retinal and all-trans-retinol. In this study, visual function for demanding visual tasks was assessed in IRBP knock-out (KO) mice. Surprisingly, IRBP KO mice showed no differences in scotopic critical flicker frequency (CFF) compared to wildtype (WT). However, they did have lower photopic CFF than WT. IRBP KO mice had reduced scotopic and photopic acuity and contrast sensitivity compared to WT. IRBP KO mice had a significant reduction in outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness, PR outer and inner segment, and full retinal thickness (FRT) compared to WT. There were fewer cones in IRBP KO mice. Overall, these results confirm substantial loss of rods and significant loss of cones within 30 days. Absence of IRBP resulted in cone circuit damage, reducing photopic flicker, contrast sensitivity, and spatial frequency sensitivity. The c-wave was reduced and accelerated in response to bright steps of light. This result also suggests altered retinal pigment epithelium activity. There appears to be a compensatory mechanism such as higher synaptic gain between PRs and bipolar cells since the loss of the b-wave did not linearly follow the loss of rods, or the a-wave. Scotopic CFF is normal despite thinning of ONL and reduced scotopic electroretinogram (ERG) in IRBP KO mice, suggesting either a redundancy or plasticity in circuits detecting (encoding) scotopic flicker at threshold even with substantial rod loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.