Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37445742›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

The Cuprizone Mouse Model: A Comparative Study of Cuprizone Formulations from Different Manufacturers.

Malena Beecken, Louise Baumann, Elise Vankriekelsvenne, Katerina Manzhula, Theresa Greiner, Leo Heinig, Steffen Schauerte, Markus Kipp, Sarah Joost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Malena BeeckenInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Louise BaumannInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Elise VankriekelsvenneInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Katerina ManzhulaInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Theresa GreinerInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-7534
Leo HeinigInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4052-7125
Steffen SchauerteInstitute of Organic Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Markus KippInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-9052
Sarah JoostInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8654-8904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cuprizone mouse model is widely used in studies on de- and remyelination. In the hands of different experimenters, the Cuprizone concentrations that lead to comparable levels of demyelination differ considerably. The reasons for this variability are unknown. In this study, we tested whether different Cuprizone formulations from different vendors and manufacturers influenced Cuprizone-induced histopathological hallmarks. We intoxicated male C57BL/6 mice with six Cuprizone powders that differed in their manufacturer, vendor, and purity. After five weeks, we analyzed the body weight changes over the course of the experiment, as well as the demyelination, astrogliosis, microgliosis and axonal damage by histological LFB-PAS staining and immunohistochemical labelling of PLP, IBA1, GFAP and APP. All Cuprizone formulations induced demyelination, astrogliosis, microgliosis, axonal damage and a moderate drop in body weight at the beginning of the intoxication period. In a cumulative evaluation of all analyses, two Cuprizone formulations performed weaker than the other formulations. In conclusion, all tested formulations did work, but the choice of Cuprizone formulation may have been responsible for the considerable variability in the experimental outcomes.

Indexed as

CuprizoneDemyelinating DiseasesAnimalsBody WeightDisease Models, AnimalGliosisMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyelin SheathCuprizoneastrogliosisCuprizone mouse modeldemyelinationmicrogliosis

Identifiers

PMID37445742
PMCPMC10341492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.