Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37445739›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Small Open Reading Frame-Encoded Micro-Peptides: An Emerging Protein World.

Xiaoping Dong, Kun Zhang, Chengfeng Xun, Tianqi Chu, Songping Liang, Yong Zeng, Zhonghua Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification of Canonical and Alternative Proteins by Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Identification of Potentially Coding Small ORFs in Plant Transcriptomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Eukaryotic mRNA Coding Potential.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. C(P)XCG Proteins ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoping DongNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Kun ZhangThe State Key Laboratory of Developmental Biology of Freshwater Fish, College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Chengfeng XunNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Tianqi ChuNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Songping LiangNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Yong ZengNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0119-2852
Zhonghua LiuNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Hunan Normal University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071262National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171271National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271329National Natural Science Foundation of China 32273111Science and technology innovation Program of Hunan Province 2020RC4023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small open reading frames (sORFs) are often overlooked features in genomes. In the past, they were labeled as noncoding or "transcriptional noise". However, accumulating evidence from recent years suggests that sORFs may be transcribed and translated to produce sORF-encoded polypeptides (SEPs) with less than 100 amino acids. The vigorous development of computational algorithms, ribosome profiling, and peptidome has facilitated the prediction and identification of many new SEPs. These SEPs were revealed to be involved in a wide range of basic biological processes, such as gene expression regulation, embryonic development, cellular metabolism, inflammation, and even carcinogenesis. To effectively understand the potential biological functions of SEPs, we discuss the history and development of the newly emerging research on sORFs and SEPs. In particular, we review a range of recently discovered bioinformatics tools for identifying, predicting, and validating SEPs as well as a variety of biochemical experiments for characterizing SEP functions. Lastly, this review underlines the challenges and future directions in identifying and validating sORFs and their encoded micropeptides, providing a significant reference for upcoming research on sORF-encoded peptides.

Indexed as

GenomePeptidesComputational BiologyMicropeptidesOpen Reading FramesMicropeptidesPeptidescoding potential predictionmicro-proteinspeptidomeSEPssmall (short) open reading framesORFsORF-encoded peptides

Identifiers

PMID37445739
PMCPMC10341979
OpenAlexW4382068782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.