Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37445553›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Evolution of National Guidelines on Medicines Used to Treat COVID-19 in Pregnancy in 2020-2022: A Scoping Review.

Emeline Maisonneuve, Odette de Bruin, Guillaume Favre, Anna Goncé, Serena Donati, Hilde Engjom, Eimir Hurley, Nouf Al-Fadel, Satu Siiskonen, Kitty Bloemenkamp and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Adverse outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19 according to hospitalization status: A prospective individual participant data meta-analysis in Europe and North America.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emeline MaisonneuveInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-4468
Odette de BruinDepartment of Obstetrics, WKZ Birthcentre, Division Woman and Baby, UMC Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-3411
Guillaume FavreMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6181-3126
Anna GoncéBCNatal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Serena DonatiNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2072
Hilde EngjomDepartment of Health Promotion, Department of Health Registry Research and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, N-5808 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-4283
Eimir HurleyPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy and PharmaTox Strategic Initiative, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Nouf Al-FadelSaudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh 13513-7148, Saudi Arabia.
Satu SiiskonenDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-9530
Kitty BloemenkampDepartment of Obstetrics, WKZ Birthcentre, Division Woman and Baby, UMC Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hedvig NordengPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy and PharmaTox Strategic Initiative, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-2918
Miriam SturkenboomDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David BaudMaterno-Fetal and Obstetrics Research Unit, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9914-6496
Alice PanchaudInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of medicines to treat COVID-19 has made it difficult to establish evidence-based treatment guidelines for pregnant women. Our aim was to provide a review of the evolution and updates of the national guidelines on medicines used in pregnant women with COVID-19 published by the obstetrician and gynecologists' societies in thirteen countries in 2020-2022. Based on the results of the RECOVERY (Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy) trial, the national societies successively recommended against prescribing hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir and azithromycin. Guidelines for remdesivir differed completely between countries, from compassionate or conditional use to recommendation against. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was authorized in Australia and the UK only in research settings and was no longer recommended in the UK at the end of 2022. After initial reluctance to use corticosteroids, the results of the RECOVERY trial have enabled the recommendation of dexamethasone in case of severe COVID-19 since mid-2020. Some societies recommended prescribing tocilizumab to pregnant patients with hypoxia and systemic inflammation from June 2021. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies were authorized at the end of 2021 with conditional use in some countries, and then no longer recommended in Belgium and the USA at the end of 2022. The gradual convergence of the recommendations, although delayed compared to the general population, highlights the importance of the inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials and of international collaboration to improve the pharmacological treatment of pregnant women with COVID-19.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinesCOVID-19national guidelinespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37445553
PMCPMC10342271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.